Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Can truth be good and evil?

Reading this post of the Chateau:

From a reader:
Wasn’t going to go out tonight, but decided a few beers were in order after watching Gingrich bullshit his way thru another debate.
Long story short…in the beer garden, overheard a tall skinny herb explaining his desire to kill himself over a woman.
Long story short, after disciplining him over giving two shits about what a woman thinks of him, took his phone, bookmarked the Chateau, and told him if he reads the articles and comments, his life will be changed in 6 months.
Peace. And thanks for all you do.
I bet the Chateau has saved more lives, literally and figuratively, than all the feminist blogs on the internet combined. A remarkable feat when you consider the exuberant hate with which this blog dispenses its very special lessons.
Prince of sex, king of love, suicide prevention hotline: Chateau Heartiste.
So, the utility and helpfulness of game is illustrated -- let this AFC (or omega? I forget my pickup jargon occasionally) rise above his latest breakup, and hopefully pull himself together a few months down the line. 

Usually, most game advice is good, and helpful, like this fashion post or one of Roosh's inspirational posts, notably this one on getting out of a slump.

No matter how bad things get, all it takes is one girl, one night, to get you back on track. I don’t care how many rejections you’ve sustained beforehand, or how many dozens of girls have recently flaked on you, but that one special meeting, which you cannot predict, will pick you up and give you the confidence you need to keep getting more and better. If life is full of peaks and valleys and you’re in a deep slump, it’s just a matter of time until you get out of it, yet it’s not enough to merely go out. You can’t sit quietly in the dark corner of the bar for two hours and think you’ll be thrown a bone. You must work hard, consistency and continually, approaching and persisting every night to your maximum capability until your head hits your pillow. 

This is gold.  God knows how many fruitless nights I've gone out and given up, but end up with a SNL or solid # close based on a chance encounter.  

But, anyway, those are feel good posts.  No one is going to demand to burn Chateau at the stake for that. 

But then, we get tougher.
Here he posts on chicks dig jerks, but relating to the Norway massacre:
As everyday observation to those with the eyes to see demonstrates, the primary motivation is women’s love for unrepentant, rule-breaking assholes. That is the elemental, core female hindbrain algorithm that governs all other lustful dispositions and is the catalyst for her mate choice decisions.

On a similar note, Roosh posts on anger being an aphrodesiac to women:
A girl will never say that she wants a man with the temper of a black bear because that would force them to admit they’re wired to be illogical and irrational. Instead they lie to themselves until guys like me figure out their buttons and reap the benefits by being that bear. 

Or even better, don't listen to women!
I’ve come to the conclusion that you shouldn’t listen to a woman about anything. I’ve observed almost no cases where a man’s status or position has been increased from following a woman’s advice or opinions, and it’s much more likely for him to be harmed from it.

And then another one on the death of feminism:
Feminists are scared shitless of the implications of sociobiological theory, and it’s easy to see why. The whole edifice of feminism teeters on the shaky proposition that sex differences feminists find unpalatable are amenable to change (i.e., “improvement”) via government and societal intervention. If it is found that sex differences are instead hard-wired into the brain architecture through the process of millions of years of natural and sexual selection and are resistant to social reengineering schemes, then feminism as a practical ideology is utterly discredited.

But in the same post he writes:
If feminists present a theory of human behavior which explains the available evidence better than evolutionary psychology, I’ll give it its due. Of course they will not do so because they and their cohorts have nothing but lies. For example, the highly popular “stereotype threat” theory held near and dear by racial egalitarians — close cousins of feminism — has recently been proven a sham.

OOO now we're talking.

And another post is the nail in the coffin:
But egalitarians and the SWPL industrial complex know that these softening words cannot contain the horrible, unrelenting, monstrous truth that stalks every cooing syllable. IQ is FUCKING HUGELY IMPORTANT to your chance to live a happy, successful life filled with wonder and glee and gadgets and crime-free neighborhoods in a modern, technofantastical, information-highwayed, cognitively stratifying first world Western nation.
The enemies of truth know this, and that is why they tirelessly work to shut down any talk about it, and to smear and slander and shun those who would deign to lift the veil of lies for a peek underneath.

Why is this important?
Not only does it cut straight to the beating heart of equalist ideology — the predominant ideology, arguably, of the last 150 years in the West — but the ramifications of the subject under debate are huge.

I agree.  The ramifications ARE huge.  Which is why liberal Will Saletan wrote a column on this in 2007 and was subsequently crucified.  The thing is, is that he didn't write this for ego.  he wrote this because he's genuinely concerned about what happens when the house of cards on PC collapses.
It's time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true.

Why is this so important?
Equality, hope, and brotherhood—are under scientific threat today. But this time, the threat is racial genetics, and the people struggling with it are liberals.
Evolution forced Christians to bend or break. They could insist on the Bible's literal truth and deny the facts, as Bryan did. Or they could seek a subtler account of creation and human dignity. Today, the dilemma is yours. You can try to reconcile evidence of racial differences with a more sophisticated understanding of equality and opportunity. Or you can fight the evidence and hope it doesn't break your faith.

Can we?  Can society adapt, or will we break? If we look at the history of the race and IQ controversy, we see that racism has been equated with genocide.
Psychological testing historically has been a quasi-scientific tool in the perpetuation of racism on all levels of scientific objectivity, it [testing] has provided a cesspool of intrinsically and inferentially fallacious data which inflates the egos of whites by demeaning Black people and threatens to potentiate Black genocide.

So, what am I getting at?  Many aspects of the game community are good, but if you truly take the truths that put forth for real, then we must keep going down the rabbit hole and arrive at the race problem.  How we deal with it will define out generation.

And if you think it's going to be easy, I leave you with this:

The comments are illuminating.

How forgiving will we be when we realize that not only were we lied to regarding women and men, but also about the fundamental value underlying our society: equality?

No comments:

Post a Comment